﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: transparent flash seo: still a way off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off</link>
	<description>technology, politics, armchair philosophy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Josh</title>
		<link>http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshua.almirun.com/?p=165#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by evilenvygirl on 2008-08-05  transparent flash seo: still a way off  http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off - bookmarked by 3 members [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by evilenvygirl on 2008-08-05  transparent flash seo: still a way off  <a href="http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off" rel="nofollow">http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off</a> - bookmarked by 3 members [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Velevitch</title>
		<link>http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Velevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshua.almirun.com/?p=165#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>Can't some, if not all, of this be resolved by updating your robots.txt file to tell Google (and others) not index those types of resources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t some, if not all, of this be resolved by updating your robots.txt file to tell Google (and others) not index those types of resources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Stewart</title>
		<link>http://joshua.almirun.com/tech/transparent-flash-seo-still-a-way-off#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshua.almirun.com/?p=165#comment-848</guid>
		<description>I agree, that's not what I want at all either. I'm hoping Google changes the way they index content. We've given them a player capable of that (as I understand it), but it's totally up to them as to how they actually index the content.

Hope that helps.

=Ryan
rstewart@adobe.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, that&#8217;s not what I want at all either. I&#8217;m hoping Google changes the way they index content. We&#8217;ve given them a player capable of that (as I understand it), but it&#8217;s totally up to them as to how they actually index the content.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>=Ryan<br />
<a href="mailto:rstewart@adobe.com">rstewart@adobe.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
